"[S]omething is drastically wrong with what's going on in our United States right now. And when an individual is turned down to get into the military and then can be -- is able to go out and buy a .9-millimeter Glock pistol, and he had one of the -- or his clips were the extended clips that were limited to law enforcement only, and, you know, that -- or somebody has to put a stop to that."
~ Colonel Bill Badger
Army, Retired
For those of you who, during the past week, have been living in a cave, or without power due to ice, snow, or a combination of both, Col. Badger is one of the heroes - along with Roger Salzgeber and Patricia Maisch - who subdued Jared Lee Loughner, the man accused of killing six people and wounding 14 more at a political gathering in Tucson, Arizona on January 8, 2011. Three days later, Col. Badger spoke with Wolf Blitzer on CNN's Situation Room, and responded to one of Blitzer's questions with the above quotation.
I cannot say whether Col. Badger knew why Loughner was rejected by the Army. Military officials indicated it was due to a failed drug test, yet many media outlets - and even more bloggers - have speculated Loughner's mental health was the primary reason. Whether or not a positive drug test led to Loughner's failed attempt to enlist in the Army, it has been well established that he suffered from severe mental illness(es). Which brings the question of gun control to the forefront once again, most significantly this one: should an individual with a mental illness be allowed to legally purchase and own a gun?
This evening on ABC's World News with Diane Sawyer, David Wright interviewed Bob Templeton, organizer of the Cross Roads of the West Gun Shows which opens in Tucson this week, eerily reminding me of the equally tasteful decision made by the National Rifle Association's head honchos, including Überguntoter Charleton Heston, who refused to postpone or relocate their 1999 National Convention in Denver eleven days after the Columbine massacre occurred just miles away in Littleton, Colorado. Templeton, stepwise with the NRA party line, does not want any additional restrictions on gun ownership as it would "punish all gun owners."
I'm confused, nay, baffled: do Templeton and the NRA fear all current and/or potential gun owners may fail a test of mental competence? My goodness, no wonder they oppose nearly all forms of gun control. (In February 2000, the NRA gave thousands of dollars to Colorado state legislators in an effort to defeat Columbine-inspired gun control laws. Their efforts succeeded, and only a few NRA-backed laws passed, gestures such as a law allowing police officers to arrest individuals who buy guns for criminals or children, and the re-authorization of longstanding state background checks.)
Now, as I pull my tongue out of my cheek, I must make a very serious, not to mention private and somewhat embarrassing, admission: I suffer from a severe and potentially fatal mental illness and should never, ever be allowed to purchase a handgun. Yet, here in my home state of Georgia, I can.
In 1968, federal laws were passed in an effort to keep guns out of the hands of mentally "disturbed" (I love that euphemism) individuals. The law is terribly strict: a psychiatrist's diagnosis is not enough to support an individual is mentally ill; treatment must be court-ordered. However, some states have legislated tougher restrictions than the federal bans. In Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, and Washington, potential gun owners must waive all rights of privacy to their mental health records. In California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Rhode Island, buyers must obtain a gun license from law enforcement officials. (Those poor constituents of Hawaii, Illinois, and New Jersey are hit twice! I suppose they must eat NRA conventioneers for breakfast in those states.) But in the remaining 36 states, mentally ill individuals are subject only to the same, generally meager, gun control laws which exist for anyone else. Here in Georgia, in a mere 48 hours I can have my own .9 millimeter pistol - although personally, I'd probably choose a .22 revolver given the size and strength of my hands. And while no one in Georgia or any other state needs to worry about their own safety from me, my loved ones would surely need to worry about mine. You see, since the age of nine I have suffered from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), formerly known as clinical depression, and I have contemplated and/or attempted suicide more times than I could even hazard a guess. Most of the time, medication and therapy keep me safe and (relatively) sound; however, every so often they fail, and I fall down into the deepest, darkest well you can imagine, where I can see neither the sign of even a glimmer of distant light, nor any foothold with which I may climb my way out. These episodes usually last much longer than 48 hours, and unless I made a cry for help, no one could stop me from buying and receiving a handgun, taking it back to the apartment I share with no one but my dog and cat, putting it into my mouth and blowing the back of my brains onto my soft sofa with its red-and-gold silk pillows, the photographs of family on the table next to me, and these pretty gold walls.
But hey, at least I wouldn't inconvenience any other potential gun owner. Including the sociopath who used to come over to the apartment across the hall where his ex-girlfriend lived and beat the crap out of her. Hell, maybe he already owns guns; I haven't seen him since, a week after I moved into my apartment, she just disappeared in the middle of the night.
None of this is bullshit, none of it fabricated, elaborated, glorified, or gore-ified. It is the mean, hard, cold fucking truth, just like the deaths of all those high school kids in Colorado, the babies in Oklahoma City, and one beautiful little girl in Tuscon, Arizona, who had so much more to give to the world. Just like, I hope, I do.
If not, well...
"You can have my gun when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers."